I have recently published an article in the PAVILION journal for politics and culture #17. Apprehension. Understanding through fear of understanding. This issue is also the reader for the Bucharest Biennale 6.
To order the printed copy please click here.
For the Europan 12 competition we have participated on the Paris Saclay site with the River Rythms project. The general theme of the competition has been “the adaptable city”. Team members: Razvan George Gorcea (leader), Alexandru Senciuc (associate), Cristina Sucala (associate), Taeyun Kim (collaborator), Andreea Druga (collaborator).
During my activity at SCS* Sensual City Studio (Pauline Marchetti, Philippe Simay and Jacques Ferrier) and at Jacques Ferrier Architectures I have worked on the ZAC Carmes Madeleine project. I was mainly concerned with the following tasks: a proposal for the “Garden of possibilities” and a study of the limit between Public Space and Private Space.
View of the Garden of Possibilities Continue reading
The existing mechanisms of collective deliberation in urban, national, international, global space are in an embryonic state. Inefficient, inaccessible, inexistent, these devices obstruct the functioning of the political systems of democracy. In 2011, the revolution in the Arab world, the 15M movement and the Occupy Wall Street movement, the sphere of online activism (re)entered into the sphere of global public space. The efficiency of its devices shown in the mobilization, organization and collective construction opened a new possible universe, of the invisible mobilization.
Taking this phenomenon as an example, the dissertation studies how its function, its uses, its features and its technologies could be transferred to the public sphere. By deconstructing and reconstructing the relationship between technology and its use, the pattern of the invisible mobilization is completed in its physical and virtual dimensions.
Overall, the invisible mobilization and the architecture project New Technologies in Istanbul form a sphere which articulates different forms of public space at different scales: urban, national, international and global. This joint does not create in a concentrical way, but rather in a transversal multidirectional way. The figure of this political act is to fill the pockets left empty by the spherical systems of representative democracy with ephemeral forms of direct democracy.